Midori and Pale Moon have similar incomplete HTML5 support, but show very poor performance as compared to the top three browsers.
QUPZILLA VS OPERA FULL
While Opera Developer beats Firefox performance by a hair's width, it doesn't have full HTML5 support. Pale Moon 24.6.2 3443 Doesn't support all HTML5 video formatĮpiphany 3.12.1 ? Doesn't support WebGL, aborts during later test Midori 0.5.8 3473 Doesn't support all HTML5 video format
Opera DeveloDoesn't support all HTML5 video format In retrospect, your comments about Pale Moon make others on here think you know a lot about Pale Moon when in reality, you know very little about Pale Moon when compared against Firefox and what the developers do with Pale Moon performance wise since Pale Moon is now a true fork of Firefox (and not a clone). Instead of making the "assumption" the developers of Pale Moon don't have experience doing performance tuning using the Firefox code, why don't you go over to the Pale Moon forums site, register for the site and ask one of the developers in a private message (and I suggest contacting the developer, Moonchild) and get the info "straight from the horses mouth" so to speak. Pale Moon for linux was first tested in August of 2013 and then released to the general linux public in January of 2014. Windows only Pale Moon made it's debut in October of 2009. Xenopeek wrote:I doubt Palemoon developers have experience doing performance tuning on the Firefox code.
0 kommentar(er)
